Music link:     https://youtu.be/CM4ILF7BHTg?list=RDCM4ILF7BHTg

You know, the other day I wrote a paper and I wanted to reflect the "KINDNESS," of our Lord Jesus, so I ask 'google' if there was a song which reflected that attribute of God. Well, I was given a few suggestions, but nothing fit. 

Well, then the Holy Spirit pointed out another song on "You Tube," which was even more appropriate for the content that I was writing about, I thought. 

I can't even remember which song it was because recently the Lord has been giving me some incredible songs which fit the content of those individual papers which I am writing about. 

Nevertheless, I happened to be thinking about this case which has been making national headlines and again, my mind was led to the remarkable "Kindness and Mercy," of our God. 

"Later, as I was checking "You Tube" an algorithm suggested a song based on my searches from earlier in the week."

So, as I listened to it, I just thought that it would be an appropriate song for when this "Verdict," comes down that so many people are expecting, as well, as those who are "chomping on their bit" to hear? 

2nd Music link:   https://youtu.be/xeZe1NzjNoQ?list=RDxeZe1NzjNoQ 

8 But anyone who does not love does not know God, for God is love.

9 God showed how much he loved us by sending his one and only Son into the world so that we might have eternal life through him. 

10 This is real love—not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as a sacrifice to take away our sins.

11 Dear friends, since God loved us that much, we surely ought to love each other. 

12 No one has ever seen God. But if we love each other, God lives in us, and his love is brought to full expression in us.

13 And God has given us his Spirit as proof that we live in him and he in us. 

14 Furthermore, we have seen with our own eyes and now testify that the Father sent his Son to be the Savior of the world. 

15 All who declare that Jesus is the Son of God have God living in them, and they live in God. 

16 We know how much God loves us, and we have put our trust in his love.

 God is love, and all who live in love live in God, and God lives in them. 

 Music link:        https://youtu.be/fGRMdx1b9cY?list=RDfGRMdx1b9cY

Earlier today was Friday and I would just like to say that in the past week I have witnessed some of the lowest forms of man’s interaction with man than I have in any other part of my life. I believe that an anecdote which I heard tonight from a Fox News show summed up it all. 

You see, for the last few weeks I have been trying to psych myself up to where I can begin an extended “Fast,” as I used to do when younger. 

Nonetheless, Satan keeps throwing these distractions in front of me, so it throws off my plans. You know, like burning my apartment down, causing a group of insensitive sales sharks to forcefully and falsely charge non needed products to my bank accounts and causing them to cause “Overdrafts,” which I had never expected to owe. 

Next, there was a major issue in which I felt that I needed to comment on, though that was my only intent. Nevertheless, it seems as if I have been drawn into this major national split among the non-believers, as if my name suggested that I was an original “Hatfield.”

I am not; I was just pointing out a fact that should also be taken into account with a particular court case because this part of human illness has long been recognized even before Psychology and Psychiatry ever had been imagined or put to paper.

Were you aware of that?

Here allow me a short synopsis from my old friend “Google man.”  

From “Google:”

AI Overview

Belief in demonic possession has been recognized in human civilizations for at least 5,000 years, with the earliest recorded instances dating back to ancient Mesopotamia around the 3rd millennium BCE (c. 2500 BCE). 

Throughout history, what ancient peoples diagnosed as possession by malevolent spirits or demons is widely understood by modern medical historians to have been early descriptions of neuropsychiatric conditions, such as epilepsy, schizophrenia, 

Tourette's syndrome, and dissociative identity disorders. 

Timeline of Earliest Recognition Across Civilizations

• Mesopotamia      (c. 2500 BCE): The earliest documented evidence comes from cuneiform      tablets found in ancient Sumer and Babylon. The Mesopotamians believed      that physical and mental illnesses were caused by specific possessing      demons (such as the headache-demon Idpa). They employed specialized      priest-healers called Āšipu to perform the world's first recorded      exorcisms. 

• Ancient      Egypt (c. 2000 BCE): The Egyptians attributed sudden personality changes      or illnesses to angry deities or wandering, restless ghosts (akhu)      entering the body. They utilized protective magicians and written      incantations known as "execration texts" to banish these      entities. 
• 
  
• Ancient      China (c. 11th Century BCE): During the Shang and Zhou dynasties,      historical records and folk traditions detail jitong (spirit      mediums) interacting with or expelling possessing spirits, which could be      either ancestral ghosts or malevolent demons. 

• Ancient      Israel (c. 1000 BCE): The Hebrew Bible records one of the earliest West      Asian accounts of spirit possession in the First Book of Samuel. It      describes King Saul being tormented by an "evil spirit", which      David famously managed to soothe and temporarily expel by playing a harp. 

• Ancient      Greece and Rome (c. 5th Century BCE onwards): While Hippocratic physicians      argued that conditions like epilepsy were natural brain disorders, popular      Greco-Roman culture widely believed in daimones (spirits) that      could seize control of a person's body, causing madness or involuntary      movements. 

• The      New Testament Era (1st Century CE): The concept of demonic possession      became heavily institutionalized in Western thought through the Christian      Gospels. Early texts like the Gospel of Mark (c. 70 CE) framed exorcisms      as a primary demonstration of spiritual authority. 

These are results for how many times is demon possession mentioned or talked about in the bible?

Search instead for how many times is demon possesion mentioned or talked about in the bible?

AI Overview

Demon possession and direct demonic influence are mentioned or referred to in the New Testament roughly 80 to 90 times, with the specific Greek verb for being demon-possessed (daimonizomai) appearing 13 times. 

Key Breakdown of Mentions

• The      Specific Greek Word (Daimonizomai): The exact term      translated as "demon-possessed" or "demonized" occurs      13 times in the New Testament. Twelve of these describe individuals      possessed by a spirit, and one (John 10:21) is an accusation against      Jesus. 

• General      Mentions of Demons and Unclean Spirits: The broader words for      demons (daimónion) and unclean spirits appear over 80 times      combined, mostly within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke)      during Jesus' ministry. 

• Specific      Narrative Accounts: There are around 7 to 9 detailed, distinct      individual accounts of Jesus or the apostles casting out a demon from a      possessed person (such as the Gerasene demoniac or the boy at the foot of      the mountain). 

• Old Testament      References: Direct mentions of demonic possession are virtually      absent in the Old Testament, though passages like 1 Samuel 16 and 18      describe an "distressing" or "evil spirit from the      Lord" troubling King Saul. 

(Author’s note: in the non fictional account of King Saul, the King was possessed in his body with a murderous demon which consistently plotted and planned the killing of David, son of Jesse, who would later become the King of Israel. By all biblical accounts from what I have gathered through the scriptures was the account as I have explained it. ) 

These are results for How many times did Saul plot and plan to kill David like when he threw the sword at him in the palace?
 

AI Overview

King Saul directly or indirectly tried to kill David at least 8 to 10 distinct times recorded in 1 Samuel. 

The Bible records these attempts as a mix of sudden rages in the palace and long-term military pursuits across the wilderness. 

Direct Attacks in the Palace (Throwing Spears/Swords)

• First Spear Attack (1 Samuel 18:10-11): While      David was playing the harp to soothe an evil spirit tormenting Saul, the      king hurled a spear at him, intending to pin him to the wall. David dodged      it. 

• Second Spear Attack (1 Samuel 18:11): Right      after the first miss, Saul threw the spear a second time, and David again      slipped away from his presence. 

• Third Spear Attack (1 Samuel 19:9-10): Later,      after another period of peace, an evil spirit came upon Saul again in the      palace. He tried to pin David to the wall with a spear a third time. David      ducked, and the spear embedded in the wall as David fled into the      night. 

Indirect Plots and Traps

• Sending David to War (1 Samuel 18:13, 17): Saul      removed David from the palace and made him a military commander over a      thousand troops, hoping the Philistines would kill him in battle. 
• 
  
• The Bride Price Trap (1 Samuel 18:25): Saul      offered his daughter Michal to David on the condition that David bring      back the foreskins of 100 Philistines, secretly plotting for David to be      killed during the challenge. 

• Assassination at Home (1 Samuel 19:11): Saul      sent hit squads/messengers to watch David's house and kill him in the      morning. Michal helped David escape through a window. 

• Hunting him at Ramah (1 Samuel 19:20-24): Saul      sent three separate groups of messengers, and eventually went himself, to      capture and kill David at Naioth in Ramah, though God intervened by      causing them to prophesy instead. 
• 
  

Prolonged Wilderness Manhunts

• Pursuit in Ziph and Horesh (1 Samuel      23:14-26): Saul relentlessly chased David through the desert crags      and canyons, tracking him down and nearly trapping him before being called      away by a sudden Philistine invasion. 

• The Wilderness of En Gedi (1 Samuel      24:1-2): Saul took 3,000 elite soldiers to hunt down David in the      rugged wilderness rocks—the famous occasion where David snuck up and cut a      piece of Saul's robe in a cave instead of killing him. 

• Second Hunt in Ziph (1 Samuel      26:2-3): Saul gathered another 3,000 troops and camped out to hunt      David down a second time in the hill of Hachilah, where David snuck into      his camp at night and took his spear and water jug while everyone      slept. 

Following from Google:

Is demon possession or the demonic in any way recognized by Psychiatry or Psychology?

From Google AI:

AI Overview

Demon possession is not recognized as a medical or psychiatric condition by mainstream psychiatry or psychology. 

Instead, official diagnostic manuals—like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)—attribute behaviors and experiences labeled as "demonic possession" to recognized mental health or neurological conditions. 

Psychiatric and Psychological Explanations

Mental health professionals view claims or beliefs of demonic possession through scientific and clinical frameworks:

• Dissociation and DID: Conditions like      Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) involve distinct personality states      that historical or religious cultures have sometimes misinterpreted as      possession. 

• Psychosis and Schizophrenia: Symptoms such as      auditory hallucinations, delusions of external control, and abrupt      behavioral changes mirror characteristics of severe mental illness. 
• 
  
• Neurological Disorders: Temporal lobe      epilepsy, basal ganglia abnormalities, and encephalitis can trigger sudden      physical movements, seizures, and vocal outbursts. 

• Sociocognitive Factors: High suggestibility,      cultural panic, mass hysteria, and ritualized trance states can lead      individuals to enact or genuinely feel a learned role of possession. 

Lastly, one more question from Google AI with a follow up:

What does the expression mean when you say two different levels of playing field?

AI Overview

A "level playing field" means a fair situation where everyone has the same rules and an equal chance to succeed, so saying "two different levels of playing field" means there is an unfair gap or inequality between two competing groups. 

What the Expression Means

• Unequal conditions: One side has a major      advantage, like more money, better tools, or easier rules, while the other      side struggles with a disadvantage.

• Split standards: Different groups are judged      or expected to perform under completely different sets of conditions.

• Lack of fairness: The competition is not      balanced because the starting point is not equal for everyone. 

Real-World Examples

• Business: A small local shop trying to      compete with a trillion-dollar online retailer does not share the same      field; they are on different levels because the giant company has more      resources. 

• Education or Sports: If one team practices      with professional gear and expert coaches while the other plays with      broken equipment, they face two different levels of conditions.
• 
  

AI asks me for a specific question so they can be more informational:

AI asks: "If you have a specific situation or sentence where you heard this phrase, share it so I can explain how it applies there."

I answer, “Yes." 

Here is my question: “Well what if you were trying to prove a spiritual theory through a strictly physical realm?”

The following is how AI answered my question as to whether the “Playing Fields,” were equal when comparing “Spiritual Principles” from a spiritual realm) , to “Physical Principles” from a physical realm?)

Earlier today I believe that I was given an analogy:

Suppose the fastest runners in the world were gathered together in a country to go through various races which was intended to find the overall greatest and fastest runner through various and different races. 

Well, it was common knowledge except to your country that ‘shoelaces,’ were banned in all the races. Some where a few years back an episode happened where a pair of ‘shoe laces’ had caused a major collision among racers, so they were no longer considered part of a “Runners,” uniform. 

All had known that only loafer type running shoes were allowed in this annual sport. Nonetheless, since a dumb American entered the country without knowing the facts, he either had the option of being tested and tried as a runner without the benefit of a proper fit pair of Athletic shoes, or he could drop out of the race.” 

Well, this court is really not giving Lindsay Clancy the benefit of a proper pair of tight-fitting shoes to compete, instead they are trying her on a different “Playing,” field because for the world to acknowledge that demons exist, they would have to declare that they were “Sinners,” also, and that is just not Kosher with the righteous judges.  

You know, all through the trial I hear, “Well, after Ms. Clancy did this or strangled this child, she went ahead and strangled her second… 

Or something like, “She had premeditated to kill the children so she sent her husband out….

Well, what if it were a demon plotting and planning those steps as they went along? 

We don't know, yet she is being tried on the basis of a few sciences which has refused to acknowledge and has rejected as a part of science which preceded those sciences for which they are trying her on.

Well, this was why when I first suggested the theory I knew and made plain that I didn’t know, I don’t know if she killed her children or if a demon inside of her did the slashing. Nonetheless, I have to do what I have done for the last fifty years of my life and that is to take into consideration that voice which I have come to recognize to be the “voice of compassion, kindness and tenderness which I have always recognized to be of God,” and never once was proved wrong when it was exemplified by the attributes in which I just stated. 

But I knew that she was going to be tried in a ‘worldly,’ sphere of influence and that the odds of her prevailing would be pretty tough even had she been demon possessed. 

What really bothers me, however, is to hear these insecure women state something like, “What if she receives ‘no guilty by reason of insanity,’ and then is let out tomorrow?”

Wow, then she may become a gossip monger, such as yourself, Virginia, who knows?

No, I looked earlier at the record of the woman who twenty years ago, killed her five children. She has spent something like nineteen years in a low security type of hospital and for some time has had the option to request a release, though she steadfastly refuses and would rather spend her last years in that facility. 

Do you not think that after restoration of mind that she does not feel as if she were the worse person in history? 

How would you like to carry that burden through life. 

I believe that is what hell would be like. "You would be in a permanent residence where you could never escape and yet daily you wouldn't be able to think of anything else but the children you lost?"

Could you blame anyone for never wanting to leave, so you could re-establish any kind of relationships?  

"Yea, but she wouldn't have bars surrounding her, I want the worst for that woman.

This is just who I am, I have no mercy for others."

And the same with this Lindsay, by all accounts she was recognized as the most wonderful mother there was and even if her thinking was way off and it was her confusion of mental illness her intent wasn’t to send her children to hell, but for their good that they be in heaven. 

But this is why the Bible says that God’s ways are not our ways, He does not think in retribution and payback but his thoughts remain good and not evil as most men think.  

Well, when you see how mean and bitter that people can become even though many are going to spend their eternities in a lot worse place than where that woman is, you can understand why she would rather remain in prison. 

As I was watching one Fox show tonight, for a minute there I was thinking that it was an old Western where the townsfolk had just caught a young man holding a gun after the two robbers had fled who no one happened to see. 

I mean, these individuals tonight were blood thirsty, but “Hey,” it’s great ratings for Fox, as usual Fox is stirring up the verdict which is going to bring the most revenue to its shows. 

As I tuned in the show, on my way to an Amazon locker, I cought the last part of Nancy Grace’s interview with Hannity. So, as I am getting my bearings and trying to understand what I was listening too, I heard Ms. Grace, in her usual condemnation and description of how each crime that she covers was colorfully played for the audience. 

I don’t know, but I have seen the same pattern for through so many of her interviews, I am wondering if she has place a copyright on the ‘bit.” 

Nonetheless, as she was describing in morbid detail of how Lindsay went from one child to the next and then meticulously placed the exercise bands on the next child her “voice,” as the usual pattern is raised and viciously describing the act as morbidly as she can muster the events of the killings and then of course, she will confess anywhere form ten to fifty times, “You want the facts.” 

“YOU WANT THE TRUTH, I’M GIVING YOU THE TRUTH. This is the truth!

These are the facts, This is the truth!

So, I am thinking “Well, gee even Pontius Pilate , only ask, “What is truth?”

Nonetheless, we have here another Jesus declaring,” THESE ARE THE TRUTHS, I AM THE TRUTH.” 

And then we have a whole lot of other mothers spouting out nothing but vitriol for the ladies who were sympathetic to the women on trial. 

Nevertheless, you can always tell those who are sincere and those who just have wicked hearts filled with bitterness and hatred. 

What is it to you if the woman is found insane or is sentenced to die in an electric chair, which I don’t believe is an option. 

Nonetheless, in many cases you can see the blood around their lips as they spout this hatred toward a woman who they will never ever meet in their lives. 

You see, God’s thoughts are not our thoughts, while your thoughts may perhaps be on that woman in the court, God’s thoughts perhaps could be on you, as He is saddened and thinking I thought she would take after her parents, instead…

No, I believe America better start worrying about its own salvation before you start worrying that Lindsay Clancy may not be hung from a noose which would temporarily satisfy your desires until you can shift your sins and judgments onto the next person? 

Lastly, if you think these Media platforms are putting on these sympathetic pity parties for the children’s sake then you ought to sit up and smell their roses or perhaps not unless you really want to stick your nose….

No, they are just exploiting whatever they can be it gambling, gossip, religion, whatever they can make a buck off of. 

I really could I could go on for an hour concerning all of the hypocrisy that this topic has caused around the Nation?

And who do you think has perpetuated it to become such a national topic?

Surely, not Fox Corporation or those other Media sharks who are making millions from the exploitation of the issue. 

Yea, she is really getting a “Fair and Balanced,” trial. 

I mean, even the judge had given this jury more options to insure that they will not come to a conclusion that she could have possibly been insane or demon possessed. 

Well, I don’t care what any of you say, “I don’t see an equal “Playing Field.”

I see more of an old fashioned ‘lynching.” 

AI Overview

Yes, Matthew 5:7 in the New Testament directly states, “Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.” 

Key Bible Passages on Mercy

• Matthew      5:7: Jesus says that people who show mercy to others will receive      mercy themselves.
• 
  
• James      2:13: This verse explains that judgment without mercy comes to      anyone who shows no mercy, but mercy triumphs over judgment.

• Micah      6:8: The Old Testament prophet Micah tells believers that God      requires them to act justly and to "love mercy".

• Proverbs      14:21: It notes that whoever is kind to the needy is blessed, and      unfailing love and faithfulness belong to those who plan good. 

   James 2:13 NKJV 13 For judgment is without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment. 

Proper judgment ...

“Mercy triumphs over judgment” (James 2:13). 

Grace over Judgment

 Scripture: James 2:13 (NRSV) — “For judgment will be without mercy to anyone who has shown no mercy; mercy tri...

The Context of the Beatitudes (Matthew 5:1–12)

Matthew 5:7 is part of the Sermon on the Mount, a famous collection of Jesus' teachings.

• The      Structure: The Beatitudes consist of eight blessings, each      beginning with the word "Blessed."
• 
  
• The      Audience: Jesus was speaking to his disciples and a large crowd on a      mountainside.
• 
  
• The      Core Message: They turn worldly values upside down. Jesus teaches that      God honors humility, purity, and a desire for justice rather than power or      wealth.
• 
  
• The      Divine Pattern: The promise that the merciful will receive mercy shows      a cause-and-effect relationship in God's kingdom.

Practical Ways to Show Mercy Every Day

Scripture teaches that mercy is an active choice, not just a passive feeling.

• Forgive      quickly: Let go of grudges and release people from their offenses.

• Withhold      harsh judgment: Choose understanding and patience over immediate      criticism.

• Help      the vulnerable: Provide food, clothing, or shelter to those who cannot      repay you.

• Listen      without interrupting: Offer deep attention and empathy to someone who      is hurting.

• Speak      up for others: Defend victims of injustice or unfair treatment in your      community.

AI Overview

The scripture "Precious in the sight of the LORD is the death of His saints" is found in Psalm 116:15. 

• Meaning:     God values the lives and deaths of His faithful followers. Their passing      is not a light matter to Him, because they return to His presence. 

Music Link:     https://youtu.be/kRVyN5kkafo?list=RDkRVyN5kkafo

..about fed up with Fox.

8-29-2026

Just an added note: 

Allow me to expand on my rebuke to this superior investigator which Fox News hails as a modern Sherlock Holmes. I have yet to hear her on Hannity where Sean doesn’t explain her hardship as a young person losing her fiancé and then going on as some kind of public servant as an Attorney General or something. 

Nonetheless, I have yet to hear the women where she isn’t screaming into the microphone as she gives her versions of the aledged “killer or killers,” reenacting their crimes, as if she were above them watching every detail and then proclaiming, “These are the facts.”

“These are the facts!”

Or perhaps, “This is the truth, what I am telling you is the truth.” 

Well, I am sorry ‘honey,’ but every time you relay your imaginative crime scenes, all that I hear is a woman responding with what sounds to be with a lot of ‘bitterness, unforgiveness and hatred’ coming from your heart. 

And If this bothers you, just pretend that it is as one of the conclusions that you normally give in almost every one of your reporting’s. 

As you see, “This is the truth, these are the facts sweetheart!” 

Furthermore, I feel that it is a shame for Hannity to “use,” you to stir the emotions of his audience as you do in relating these crime scenes in order to be as morbid as you can. 

Nonetheless, this is what I have recognized as a pattern in your reporting, as it enhances his ratings doesn’t it, “you poor loud mouthed and compassionate and sympathetic victim which you are trying to come across as?

Also, I recognize that Fox has also given you your own show, but that is just typical of a Media company which exploits into dollars every cause which it can manipulate into an income. 

Was I surprised that the Commies, simply “walk into New York City and conquer all of the electorate, as well, as other parts of the country where these hidden Democrats are all popping up?

Not at all because for years, your ‘Fair and Balanced,” reporting on “The Five,” had almost every point challenged by your continuing employment of these “Left” or Democrat candidates refuting all conservative strong points expressed. 

But “Hey,” it makes for great ratings and financial windfalls doesn’t it when you can manipulate audiences to challenge “truths” by a conglomeration of ‘fibbers,” and ‘disputers of truths?’

Is that a word, “Fibbers?”

From Google: 

AI Overview

"Fibbers" most commonly refers to Fibber Magee's, a popular neighborhood Irish pub and restaurant, or can mean someone who tells small, unimportant lies. 

"Small unimportant lies?"

"Is there another word for huge imaginative bull-poop lies?"

Great job Fox, keep up the good work, I think that I even read on Drudge the other day that one of your “Star Broadcasters” is even challenging the President nowadays?

No surprise there, as I have been expecting that for some time.

“Hey, when are you all going to go "all out Democrat," as I see more and more every day now as guests?”

Just wondering!

Postscript: 

What I keep forgetting to say is that whether the woman had or was in a psychosis state is a completely "moot" point if her body had been given over to a demon which had been controlling her as in the case of Saul when the scriptures state that an "evil spirit," came upon Saul, so he threw his spear at David in an act of killing him.